Can Microsoft Maintain Enterprise Interest Through Cloud and Mobile?

The past 60 days or so have shown a wave of changes at Microsoft. But are they enough to maintain interest by enterprise customers that Microsoft has long since courted…and counted on for the bulk of their revenue?

Revenue Breakdown

About a third of Microsoft’s revenue comes from their Business Division. A quarter comes from their Server and Tools Division and another quarter from their Business Division. The rest of the software giant’s $77.8 billion in revenue comes from Entertainment and Online Services (ie: Bing & MSN). Revenue from Microsoft’s Azure cloud service falls under their Server and Tools Division while their Office 365 cloud service falls under the Business Division category. The question is: Can Microsoft shift gears to replace diminishing traditional software with services such as 365 and Azure. In order to answer that question, Microsoft’s cloud strategy becomes front and center.

New CEO at the Helm

Next year will mark Microsoft’s 40th anniversary since their founding in 1975. Roughly 60 days ago, Microsoft announced a new CEO, Satya Nadella. Nadella is only the third CEO to lead Microsoft during their almost 40-year history. A long time Microsoft employee of over 20 years, Nadella has lead different parts of the organization most recently leading Microsoft’s Cloud and Enterprise Group. It is this last assignment that may be the most critical to his (and Microsoft’s) success moving forward.

Microsoft’s Halo is Strong

No, not that Halo. The halo effect from Microsoft’s existing enterprise business and relationships is strong and not expected to erode any time soon. In order to understand this further, one can look at the percentage of desktop operating system (OS) market share that Microsoft currently commands.
os_market_share_december_2013

Credit: The Next Web

Beyond desktop operating systems, Microsoft is still the dominant player in the productivity suite…by a long margin.

prod_suite_adoption

Credit: Forrester

Desktop OS and Productivity Suite are foundational to any enterprise customer. The relationship Microsoft garners with enterprise customers is strong and wide. And the value of those relationships is a gold mine that any provider today would kill to have. The question really comes back to Microsoft’s ability to convert customers from traditional software users to next generation users of cloud and mobile centric solutions.

The End of the XP Era

Well, not really. Yes, Microsoft ends support tomorrow for XP, but there is still quite a bit of the XP operating system in use between corporate systems and embedded within products. According to many, XP’s percent of desktop market share still hovers near 30%. It will take quite a while (read: years) to completely replace those systems. In the meantime, expect to see an increase in compromises through those unprotected systems.

Turning a Battleship in a Bathtub

Bringing in a new CEO that appreciates both Microsoft’s history and the new cloud centric world was a key move for Microsoft. If there was a time for Microsoft to change, now is that time. At the recent BUILD conference, Microsoft expressed their understanding of the importance from cloud and mobile. With Nadella at the helm charged with a background in cloud, the next few months will be critical to prove his ability to start the transformation of a giant. Customers will want to watch Microsoft’s next moves closely as it should set both the tone and cadence of future moves.

4 Reasons Cloud Storage is Not a Bubble About to Pop

With the recent S-1 filing by Box for their Initial Public Offering (IPO) the question of a Cloud Storage Bubble is raised once again. But is it really a bubble? And should enterprise customers take note and run for the hills? There is more at stake than what appears on the surface.

Box Files Form S-1 IPO

By Box filing their S-1, their financials are put on display for all to scrutinize. Within those figures, we learn that their 34k+ paying customers contribute $124m in revenue that offsets operational costs to the tune of a $169m loss last fiscal year. Over the past four years of reporting, Box reported an increase in the loss trend. But is this enough to consider impending doom?

Cloud Storage Startup Landscape

In 2013, Nirvanix (another cloud storage startup) closed up shop and sent their customers scrambling. Dropbox is another of the closest competitors to Box and announced their intent to IPO as well. Could Box and Dropbox be following in Nirvanix’ footsteps? Enterprise storage is expensive. Yes, there are economies of scale and tricks you can play to maximize the efficiency, but storage infrastructure is expensive.

So, let’s take a look at some potential hypothesis on what may be occurring:

Hypothesis One: There is a minimum amount of capital required to achieve profitability.

Nirvanix only took on $70m while Box and Dropbox took on $414m and $607m respectively. Consider that enterprises need stability in their cloud storage provider, a substantial number of enterprise features (ie: auth, security) and a solid ecosystem for integration. It is probable that $70m is not enough to reach ‘escape velocity’ in this space. It is possible that $400-600m may not be enough either. It is also likely that scale plays a significant role too. It will be interesting to see Dropbox’ figures when they file their S-1.

Hypothesis Two: The real value for cloud storage is not in unstructured file storage.

Sure, the ability to store, share and collaborate on files online is valuable. However, is there greater value in the meta-data that comes from understanding the behaviors of those files? Plus, similar to the problem email systems and enterprise storage vendors addressed years ago with data de-duplication, there is value to managing files at scale. Not to mention that the meta-data around that data could be repurposed for other functions.

Hypothesis Three: Unstructured file storage is simply a loss leader.

There are many directions a company like Box or Dropbox could take based on their current service offerings. Of course there are many directions this could take, but that is for a future discussion.

Hypothesis Four: The shifting enterprise storage paradigm will not allow cloud storage failure.

It is simple enough to treat all storage the same, but in reality it is not that easy. Traditional methods for storing files on internal storage sub-systems is cumbersome at best when we move into a SMAC (social, mobile, analytics, cloud) based world. Enterprises are already shifting toward cloud-based storage to alleviate the pressure and shift their paradigm. The thought of having to move back to traditional methods would break many apps and services. In the end, enterprises really need to move forward and are not able to go back.

Consider the Options

On the surface, it may appear that Box (and ostensibly Dropbox) may be losing money today, there is much more at stake. Enterprises know they need to make a shift to a SMAC based world too. The cards appear to point favorably in the direction of additional options beyond the currently cloud storage portfolio offering. I would look more toward the future opportunities of the space through one of the four hypotheses and less on the impending implosion.

The Shark of HP Converged Systems

The story of Converged Infrastructure (CI) continues to gain steam within the Information Technology (IT) industry…and for good reason. Converged solutions present a relatively easy way to manage complex infrastructure solutions. While some providers focus on CI as an opportunity to bundle solutions into a single SKU, companies such as Nutanix and HP have produced solutions for a couple of years now that go much further with true integration.

As enterprise IT customers shift their focus away from infrastructure and toward platforms, application and data, expect the CI space to heat up. Part of this shift includes platforms geared toward specific applications. This is especially true for those operating applications at scale.

Last week, HP announced their ‘shark’ approach of hardware solutions geared toward specific applications. One of the first targets is the SAP HANA application using HP Converged System 500 as part of a co-innovation project between HP & SAP. It is interesting to see HP partner with SAP HANA with so much emphasis on data analytics today. In addition, specialized solutions are becoming increasingly more important in this space.

Enterprise IT organizations need the ability to start small and grow accordingly. Even service providers may consider a start-small and grow approach. Michael Krigsman (@mkrigsman) recently wrote a post outlining how IT projects are getting smaller and still looking for relief. HP expressed their intent to provide scalable solutions that start small and include forthcoming ‘Project Kraken’ solutions later this year. Only time will tell how seamless this transition becomes.

Additional Reading:

HP CS Blog Entry:

http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/Converged-Infrastructure/HP-ConvergedSystem-for-SAP-HANA-meet-the-industry-s-most/ba-p/157176#.UynDsdy0bfM

IBM Dev@Pulse Conference Impressions

The Dev@Pulse conference is IBM’s developer conference tagging onto the core IBM Pulse conference. This is IBM’s first year trying to hold a developer-centric conference (Dev@Pulse) alongside their flagship cloud conference (IBM Pulse). Dev@Pulse is about as far away physically as you can get from the main conference and held in a nightclub rather than conference center. While Hakkasan LV Nightclub is a trendy choice to hold a developer summit, the attendance seemed thin and pulled from the existing IBM user base.

In talking with folks at the event, it seems IBM is trying new things like lightning talks, demos and a playground to woo developers. There are several labs to choose from too. In talking with devs prior to the event, many of them had not hear of Pulse, let alone Dev@Pulse. This seems like a miss on IBM’s part to attract new developers to the IBM ecosystem. After attending several sessions at Dev@Pulse, I’d say that it has the makings of a decent developer conference.

A good example was IBM’s technical rundown of the just-announced IBM BlueMix. The session went soup-to-nuts on how to deploy an app using BlueMix as a great summary introduction of how BlueMix works and how to deploy an app using the new service. However, only 50 or so folks were in attendance for the talk here at Dev@Pulse. One presenter even asked the audience how many are Cobol programmers and several raised their hands. That is a very different crowd from the typical Node.js, Rails, Python crowd.

On the other hand, IBM is identifying the need to bridge the gap between cloud-based apps and traditional apps. They also note that the challenge is in extensively leveraging APIs. The API economy is a reality…not just with IBM but in the industry today. That’s pretty forward thinking (and refreshing) for a traditional enterprise organization like IBM. The question will be: How to get the permeation through the rest of the organization beyond just BlueMix and SoftLayer.

Trying to attract developers to a conference like IBM Pulse or Dev@Pulse will be hard to do in isolation. There are a number of other efforts in terms of location, audience, social impact and content that IBM needs to address in order to make significant, sustaining waves.

IBM Pulse Conference Impressions

IBM’s conference on cloud is taking place this week in Las Vegas at the MGM Convention Center. There are two core parts to the conference; The main Pulse general conference and the Dev@Pulse conference which is specifically targeting developers. The two conferences are…and feel…completely separate from one another.

IBM Pulse Core
The main IBM Pulse conference is IBM’s rebranding of their past Tivoli conference into a cloud conference. Pulse 2014 is branded as ‘The Premier Cloud Conference’. I’m not sure I would go that far, but it’s much more than that. IBM is bringing much more of their software portfolio to bear. Having attended, keynoted and presented at a number of cloud conferences around the globe, this one takes on quite a different vibe. It’s far more subdued and less energetic than its cloud rivals. That could stem from IBM past culture creeping forward. But there are many trying to shed the IBM of old for a fresh and modern perspective. Just talking with folks around the room, it’s clear that the individuals want to turn the corner, but it’s hard to turn a battleship in a bathtub. Changing culture is hard.

The presentations have been a mix of lukewarm depth and buzzword bingo. While the right things are being stated and the cloud-centric focus is decent, it is unclear the impact IBM has for its customers. This seems to be a pretty significant gap for IBM to fill in the coming months. One area IBM needs to address is how to attract new developers and customers. Looking around the room, 1/2 of the gentlemen are in suits while the other 1/2 are simply jacket-less. You rarely see the jeans, tee shirt or hoodie walking the floor. This speaks more to IBM’s current user base that the new millennials that are the real x-factor in cloud development today.

And speaking of developers, IBM’s Dev@Pulse developer conference is happening in tandem with IBM Pulse. More on Dev@Pulse and IBM Pulse perspectives coming soon!

Who are the biggest cloud providers?

Cloud computing has taken off like wildfire. In that vein there is a bit of discrepancy between who the largest cloud company is and isn’t. Is perception reality? One could argue that perception is reality. And the perception today is that Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) is the largest. That may be the perception, but the reality is far different.

Amazon by the Numbers

Today, Amazon’s market cap is $180 billion. In fiscal 2012, Amazon reported $61 billion in revenue. In Nov 2013, Alex Williams (@alexwilliams) of TechCrunch reported that the AWS (Amazon’s Web Services) portion is “…widely believed to be a $3.5 billion business.” That is a substantial business on its own, but pales in comparison with the revenue from the rest of the Amazon portfolio; namely amazon.com. Meaning, AWS may account for less than 6% of Amazon’s total revenue.

Largest Cloud Computing Providers

Now let’s look at the larger, publicly traded companies that focus on cloud computing solely:

Market Cap (as of Jan 24, 2014)

Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) = $379 billion

Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) = $36 billion

LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD) = $25 billion

Workday (NYSE:WDAY) = $16 billion

NetSuite (NYSE:N) = $8 billion

ServiceNow (NYSE:NOW) = $8 billion

Concur (NASDAQ:CNQR) = $6 billion

Now, these are closer to pure-play cloud providers. Meaning, their only business is cloud-based services. And they don’t represent two other groups: Diversified public companies and privately held companies.

Diversified Cloud Companies

While cloud computing may not be their primary source of revenue, one can not exclude this group from the mix. Some of the larger companies include:

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) = $309 billion -> 365, Dynamics, Azure

Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) = $168 billion -> Cloud

SAP (NYSE:SAP) = $92 billion -> Cloud

IBM (NYSE:IBM) = $196 billion -> SoftLayer

HP (NYSE:HPQ) = $55 billion -> Cloud

Verizon (NYSE:VZ) = $137 billion -> Terremark

Rackspace (NYSE:RAX) = $5 billion -> Cloud

The revenue from cloud alone from each of these companies can easily reach into the billions of dollars.

Privately Held Cloud Companies

Aside from publicly traded companies, there are a number of privately held companies. Some of which are startups. Of late, companies such as Box and Dropbox have received valuations of $2 billion and $8 billion respectively. And this is before they go IPO.

Perception vs. Reality

The point is, Amazon’s AWS may garner the 800lb gorilla perception, but there are a number of other viable and larger cloud providers in the market today. And this doesn’t account for the up-and-coming providers that could provide Amazon with some healthy competition.

Are Enterprises Prepared for the Data Tsunami?

Companies are in for a major change to how they operate, manage and leverage data in the coming years. Data is quickly becoming the new currency and leading businesses are looking for ways to capitalize on this change.

The Data Deluge Problem

A recent IDC report on data suggests the sheer amount of data generated doubles every two years. By the year 2020, the total amount of data will equate to 40,000 exabytes or 40 trillion gigabytes. To put in perspective, that’s more than 5,200 gigabytes for every man, woman and child in 2020.

However, the problem is not the data itself. The problem rests with how and what to do with the data. To complicate matters, much of the data generated comes from new sources such as wearable devices, mobile devices, social media and machine data.

Social Data Streams

The impact from social media is significant on its own:

Twitter: 400 millions tweets per day

Facebook: 4.75 billion content items shared per day

According to one whitepaper, Facebook currently houses more than 250 petabytes of data with .5 petabytes of new data arriving every day. Facebook and Twitter only represent two of the more popular social data sources yet there are many more.

IoT and Machine Data

A relatively recent source of data is coming from the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT represents a collection of uniquely identifiable items. Individually, these items generate their own sets of data. Data may also come in the form of ‘machine data’ or industrial data, which is generated through the use of equipment.

For example, GE’s GEnx next generation turbofan engines found on Boeing 787 and 747-8 aircraft contain some 5,000 data points that are analyzed every second. Put that into perspective. According to Wipro research, a single cross-country flight across the United States generates 240TB of data. The average Boeing 737 engine generates 10 terabytes every 30 minutes of flight.

Using a bit of math, the problem becomes fairly apparent. Using data from MIT’s Airline Data Project and the total number of Boeing 787’s in use as of December 31, 2013, the problem becomes:

Total data generated every day by the global 787 fleet in operation today:

(20TB/ hr x 9hr ave operation per day) x 2 engines x 114 787 aircraft = 41,040 terabytes (or 40 petabytes)

For Southwest Airlines alone, their data challenge is more significant:

Total data generated every day by Southwest Airlines’ fleet of 607 Boeing 737 aircraft:

(20TB/ hr x 10.8hr ave operation per day) x 2 engines x 607 737 aircraft = 262,224 terabytes (or 256 petabytes)

256 petabytes is a lot of data. GE included a couple more examples of Industrial Data in “The Case for an Industrial Big Data Platform.” From these examples, the sheer amount of data from IoT and machine data becomes clearly apparent. And these examples only highlight a small, specific use-case that does not take into account other aspects of the airline industry.

Not All Data is Equal

In many cases, unlike traditional enterprise data, which is structured in nature, these new sources of data reside in many forms and are typically unstructured. This presents a challenge to traditional data warehouses that are accustom to consuming and managing structured data.

When thinking about how to ‘consume’ these new sources of data, several key considerations reside with the data itself. Much of the data, in essence, has a half-life that drives its value over time. An important consideration is in which data to keep and for how long. The challenge is in knowing now what data might be needed in the future. That is easier said than done.

The default action taken by many enterprises today is to simply keep all data, which is costly just for the storage in which to house it. Unfortunately, this is leading to ‘data landfills’ of mixed data with varying degrees of value. As the volume of data increases, so will the landfills unless a different approach is taken.

The Holy Grail of Data Correlation

In addition to stockpiling data, the real value for many will come in the form of correlation. Leveraging one data stream provides valuable insight. However, when paired or correlated with multiple data streams, a much clearer picture becomes visible.

Think of the value to a company when they can compare social data, operational data and transaction data. For many marrying these data streams present multiple challenges. Now imagine that the number of streams (sources) along with the volume of data is increasing. It becomes clear how the problem gets pretty complicated pretty quickly.

Consumer vs. Corporate

From the increase in consumer adoption of devices and services over the past few years, it is clear that consumers are ready to generate more data. Enterprises need to prepare for the oncoming onslaught.

As consumers, we want enterprises to succeed in leveraging the data we provide. Take healthcare for example. Imagine if healthcare providers could correlate data between lab results, pharmacy data, claims data and social media streams. The outcome might be pre-emptive diagnosis based on trends of epidemics and illness across the globe. In addition, the results would be highly personalized and overall lower the cost of healthcare. If done, it would present significant economic and social improvements.

The Data Driven Economy

In summary, the onslaught from data is both concerning and exciting at the same time. The potential information generated from the data presents major opportunities across industries from providing greater work efficiency to saving lives. Business, as a whole, is becoming even more reliant on information and therefore data-driven. Data ultimately provides greater insight, personalization, and accuracy for business decisions.

It is important for enterprises to quickly evaluate new methods for data consumption and management. The success or failure of companies may very well reside in their ability to address the data tsunami.

Top 5 Posts of 2013

Over the course of 2013, I wrote a number of posts about CIOs, Cloud Computing, Big Data, Data Centers and IT in general. Here are the top-5 most popular posts in 2013:

5. Time to get on the Colocation Train Before it is Too Late

In the number 5 spot is a post addressing the forthcoming challenges to the data center colocation market and how the ripple effect hits IT.

4. A Workload is Not a Workload, is Not a Workload

Number 4 is a post written in 2012 about the discrepancy between cloud computing case studies. Not all workloads are the same and many of the examples used do not represent the masses.

3. The IT Role in Value Creation is Not a Technology

The number 3 spot goes to a post that addresses the direction of IT organizations within the business and how it is evolving. It is this very evolution that is both very difficult and very exciting at the same time.

2. Motivation And Work Ethics: Passion Fuels the Engine

Another post from 2012 goes to the number 2 spot, which shows that some subjects (like: the importance of passion) have staying power. This post addresses important characteristics for a leader to consider. It addresses the intersection of passion, work ethic and motivation.

1. What is Your Cloud Exit Strategy?

Probably one of the most controversial titles goes to the number 1 spot. This post addresses the challenges faced with cloud when one doesn’t think about their end-state and evolution.

Honorable Mention: So Which Is It? Airplane Mode or Turn Devices Completely Off?

Back in Apr 2012, I was traveling and noticed that many didn’t turn off their devices even though they were instructed to…which prompted the post. Even though the FAA changed their rules in US, this post still gets quite a bit of attention.

Rise of the CDO…do you need one?

The CIO (Chief Information Officer) and CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) roles are in a state of flux and starting to evolve pretty significantly. In the past year, the role of CDO or Chief Data Officer started picking up steam. 2014 will bring the CDO role to prominence among the CIO and CMO roles. But what exactly is a CDO and why is it needed now? And where is the role headed especially in consideration of the changes to the CIO and CMO roles?

THE CDO (CHIEF DATA OFFICER) ROLE

First, the CDO role is not new. Enterprises have had people filling the role for several years now. The specific function of the role, however, varies greatly…and continues to do so. Organizations tag the CDO with functions ranging from ensuring regulatory compliance to IT system integration. With the advent of Big Data, companies are now looking at the CDO to manage the huge influx of data.

Late last year, Gartner published results from a recent study on the 5 Facts About Chief Data Officers. Namely:

  1. There are over 100 CDOs today (double the number from 2012).
  2. Most reside in Banking, Government and Insurance industries.
  3. 65% reside in the US.
  4. Over 25% of those are in New York or DC.
  5. Over 25% are women (almost twice that of CIOs).

WHAT SHOULD A CDO DO AND WHY NOW?

The sheer volume of data in both type and source is growing exponentially. The methods used by a traditional marketing and IT organizations are simply inadequate to keep up. A new perspective is needed. In addition, the CMO and CIO are fully bogged down with existing challenges to streamline and evolve their organizations.

The importance of data to a company is simply too valuable to wait for existing organizations to evolve. There is a half-life to the value of data. This is where the CDO comes in. The CDO can take a business-centric approach to the data without being inhibited by existing challenges. Data spans multiple facets from marketing to product development to customer service and beyond. By leveraging a separate organization that is not biased by the priorities of either the IT or marketing organizations, companies can leverage the true value of the data more readily.

Managing data is less about how to store it on physical drives and more about correlation of data points and trends.

CDO DIRECTION

There was a time that I felt that the CDO should be part of the CIOs role. I still feel that way, but it will take time. As outlined above, the CDO role needs to be autonomous from the CIO and CMO roles. However, as each of those roles evolves, so will the CDO role. More specifically, as the CIO role evolves, so will the CDO role.

As IT organizations shift from technology-centric to business-centric, their role with data also evolves. The prevalence of data as a business driver presents a unique challenge and opportunity for IT. Stronger companies will seize this opportunity through the evolution of their CIO and collaboration with the CDO function.

IN SUMMARY

Over time, the CIO & CDO roles become far more inter-related and eventually merge into a single CIO role. However, that will take time to happen. In the meantime, every company should be considering who is responsible for truly managing (and leveraging) their data for business intelligence and growth opportunities. In many cases, that may be the CDO role.

CIO Predictions for 2014

This year, I thought I would shift the focus from cloud-specific to the broader agenda for CIOs. But before I jump into my predictions for 2014, let’s take a trip down memory lane and review how I did on Cloud Predictions for 2013.

How did I do?

  1. Rise of the Cloud Verticals: We have seen an uptick of ‘cloud brokers’ but very little in the way of cloud verticals targeting specific industries or suite of services. There has been a feeble attempt at integration between solutions, but even that was lukewarm at best in 2013. (1/2pt)
  2. Widespread Planning of IaaS Migrations: Spot on with this one! Over 2013, the number of IT organizations planning IaaS migrations stepped up in a big way. That’s great news for the IT organization, the business units and the industry as a whole. It demonstrates progress along the maturity continuum. (1pt)
  3. CIO’s Look to Cloud to Catapult IT Transformation: This has been a mixed bag. Many have leveraged cloud because they were forced into it rather than see it as one of the most significant opportunities of our time. There are exceptions to this, but they are not as prominent yet. (1/2pt)
  4. Mobile Increases Intensity of Cloud Adoption: Mobile is taking off like wildfire. And cloud is enabling the progress, as traditional methods would simply be too challenging and slow. (1pt)
  5. Cloud Innovation Shifts from New Solutions to Integration & Consolidation: Over 2013, the number of new solutions has progressed at a feverish pitch. The good indicator is that new solutions are taking into account the requirement of integration with solutions within their ecosystem. While consolidation within cloud providers started to pickup in the 2nd half of 2013, I would expect it to increase into 2014. (1pt)

Total Score: 4/5

Overall, slower general adoption of cloud paired with strong adoption of specific cloud solutions lead to 2013’s progress. I had hoped to see us further along…but alas, 2014 is shaping up to be a very interesting year.

What to look for in 2014?

  1. Cloud Consolidation: Look for plenty of M&A activity as larger incumbents gobble cloud point solutions up. Also look for incumbents to flesh out their ecosystem more fully.
  2. CIOs Focus on Data: Conversations move beyond the next bell or whistle and onto items that really change the economic landscape for a company: data. Look for the CIO to shift focus to data and away from infrastructure.
  3. Colocation is in Vogue: As the CIO moves up the maturity model toward higher-value functions, look for IT organizations to move to colocation in droves. The challenge will be moving before it’s too late.
  4. CIO, CMO + Other Execs Become Best Friends: We’ve talked for some time about how the CIO strives for a ‘seat at the table’. The challenge is in how to be a relevant participant at the table. As the CIO role shifts from support org to business driver, look for the relationships to change too.
  5. One Size Does NOT Fit All: As we talk about newer technologies, CIOs, IT organizations, vendors and service providers get realistic about where their products/ services fit best…and don’t. OpenStack and HP Moonshot are great examples of awesome solutions that fit this statement.

As I’ve said before, this has got to be the best time to work in Information Technology. How will you embrace and leverage change? Here’s to an awesome 2014!